AI同核戰:電影未揭示嘅真實危機!

Ai

🎬 YouTube Premium 家庭 Plan成員一位 只需
HK$148/年

不用提供密碼、不用VPN、無需轉區
直接升級你的香港帳號 ➜ 即享 YouTube + YouTube Music 無廣告播放


立即升級 🔗

人工智能究竟如何可能引發核戰爭?

關於人工智能(AI)同核武器嘅關係,長久以來人類都充滿恐懼。而電影往往係呢啲恐懼嘅最佳寫照。例如,《終結者》系列入面嘅天網(Skynet)突然有咗自我意識,然後向美國發射核導彈;《戰爭遊戲》(WarGames)中,WOPR電腦因誤判差點引發核戰爭;而凱瑟琳·畢格羅(Kathryn Bigelow)最近出嘅《爆炸屋》(House of Dynamite),就探討咗人工智能是否牽涉到一場針對芝加哥嘅核導彈攻擊。

Vox嘅記者Josh Keating喺節目《Today, Explained》中講,人工智能其實早已經滲透入核武器領域。「電腦早喺曼哈頓計劃製造原子彈嗰陣就已經開始用喇。」佢話,「當時開發嘅數碼電腦用嚟幫助研發核武。」但我哋唔清楚而家人工智能喺核武領域嘅確切角色同範圍。

咁我哋應唔應該擔心呢?Keating認為,可能要擔心,但唔係因為人工智能會反叛人類。

以下係佢哋嘅對話節錄,經過剪輯令內容更清晰有條理。完整節目可以喺Apple Podcasts、Pandora同Spotify等平台聽。

電影《爆炸屋》中有一幕,角色試圖搞清楚事件發生嘅原因,懷疑人工智能有冇介入。咁呢啲電影嘅恐懼係咪有啲道理?

Keating話:「關於核戰爭,電影最有趣嘅係:呢種戰爭其實從來未真正爆發過。講真,我根本諗唔到自2001年以嚟有咩事件可以比呢個更嚴重。」

編輯評論:

人工智能同核武器嘅關係,係一個充滿矛盾同未知嘅領域。電影往往以戲劇化嘅方式放大人類對新科技失控嘅恐懼,但現實世界嘅風險更微妙亦更複雜。Josh Keating指出,電腦技術從核武誕生初期就已經係核心一環,今時今日,人工智能嘅介入可能係更深層嘅決策輔助系統,而唔係獨立自主嘅「反叛者」。呢點提醒我哋,真正嘅風險唔係科幻電影中AI突然發動核戰,而係人類過度依賴自動化系統,喺緊急時刻可能因誤判或系統錯誤而引發災難。

香港社會喺科技快速發展嘅同時,亦應該關注AI嘅倫理同安全問題,尤其係關乎國家安全嘅領域。政府同科研機構需加強透明度同監管,確保AI技術唔會成為無人控制嘅危險力量。電影帶畀我哋嘅啟示,唔應該淨係停留喺恐懼層面,而係要推動更深入嘅公共討論同政策制定,避免科技發展變成一場無人能控制嘅災難。

以上文章由特價GPT API KEY所翻譯及撰寫。而圖片則由FLUX根據內容自動生成。

🎨 Nano Banana Pro 圖像生成器|打幾句說話就出圖

想畫人像、產品圖、插畫?SSFuture 圖像生成器支援 Flux Gemini Nano Banana Pro 改圖 / 合成, 打廣東話都得,仲可以沿用上一張圖繼續微調。

🆓 Flux 模型即玩,不用登入
🤖 登入後解鎖 Gemini 改圖
📷 支援上載參考圖再生成
⚡ 每天免費額度任你玩
✨ 即刻玩 AI 畫圖
Use the original face exactly as it is, without changing a details. A full-body photograph of a glamorous female model in a vibrant, retro 1950s pin-up style bikini. The lighting should be bright, sunny, and highly saturated, evocative of a vintage summer advertisement or a pop art aesthetic.
Model & Outfit:
• Model: A slender woman with a confident, slightly posed expression.
• Hair & Accessories: A white and blue patterned headband tied in a bow. Bold, dark cat-eye sunglasses. Large gold hoop earrings and thick, stacked gold bangle bracelets on both wrists. Bright red lipstick.
• Swimwear: A two-piece retro bikini with a high-waisted bottom and a halter-neck top. The top is turquoise/teal with white polka dots, featuring a large bow detail at the bust. The bottom is a contrasting, high-rise, ruched style in pale peach or coral with small dark polka dots.
Setting & Composition:
• Location: A mid-century modern-style poolside scene on a bright sunny day.
• Background Details: A sparkling blue swimming pool, several brightly colored lounge chairs (yellow, teal, pink), and large beach umbrellas (striped orange and white). There are large, bright flotation devices (yellow, teal, orange inner tube) scattered around the edge of the pool.
• Composition: Vertical, full-body shot. The model is centered, and the background is slightly blurred (shallow depth of field) to keep the focus on the model.
Aesthetic Keywords:
• Vibrant, High Saturation, Retro Summer, 1950s Pin-up, Mid-Century Modern, Pop Art, Poolside Glamour, Commercial Photography, Magazine Ad, Halter Bikini, High-Waisted, Sunny Day. 上身近鏡 4. Gamcheon Culture Village – Busan (Late Afternoon)
The tourist man in a colorful winter knit sweater, light down jacket, dark pants, and boots standing at a viewpoint overlooking the pastel-colored hillside houses of Gamcheon Culture Village. Cool winter light, cinematic depth. Main focus on the vibrant architecture, man secondary.